Head to head

AMD Instinct MI355X vs Google TPU Ironwood

AMD Instinct MI355X (AMD) and Google TPU Ironwood (Google) both sit in Chips & Compute. AMD Instinct MI355X is the cheaper entry point at Enterprise hardware, pricing not published. Google TPU Ironwood shipped more tracked changes in the last 30 days (11 vs 3). Every value below comes from the latest crawl of the vendors' own pages.

AttributeAMD Instinct MI355X

AMD

Google TPU Ironwood

Google

SegmentChips & ComputeChips & Compute
VersionMI355X7th-generation (Ironwood)
Entry costEnterprise hardware, pricing not publishedfrom $5.4/unit
Pricing tiersOpen Source freeOn Demand (us-central1) $12 · DWS Flex-start (us-central1) $6 · DWS Calendar Mode (us-central1) $8.4 · 1-year Commitment (us-central1) $8.4 · 3-year Commitment (us-central1) $5.4 · On Demand (europe-west2) $13.2 · DWS Flex-start (europe-west2) $6 · DWS Calendar Mode (europe-west2) $8.4
Model stackCDNA · CDNA 4 · ROCmGemini · Google TPU Ironwood · Ironwood · Ironwood (TPU v7) · Ironwood TPU · Ironwood TPU (7th Generation) · TPU v7 · TPU7x · TPU7x (Ironwood) · XLA compiler
Context window——
Public API
Routes models
Changes / 30d311
OriginGlobalGlobal
Capabilities288GB HBM3E, FP4/FP6 support, ROCm 7, open rack designs, DPX compute partition mode, CPX compute partition mode, NPS2 memory partitioning, GPU virtualization support9,216-chip pods, inference optimised, liquid cooled, JAX + PyTorch/XLA, Large-scale training, Reasoning and inference, 9,216 liquid-cooled chips per pod, 42.5 ExaFlops performance
Compare up to four products →