Head to head

Google TPU Ironwood vs AMD Instinct MI355X

Google TPU Ironwood (Google) and AMD Instinct MI355X (AMD) both sit in Chips & Compute. AMD Instinct MI355X is the cheaper entry point at Enterprise hardware, pricing not published. Google TPU Ironwood shipped more tracked changes in the last 30 days (11 vs 3). Every value below comes from the latest crawl of the vendors' own pages.

AttributeGoogle TPU Ironwood

Google

AMD Instinct MI355X

AMD

SegmentChips & ComputeChips & Compute
Version7th-generation (Ironwood)MI355X
Entry costfrom $5.4/unitEnterprise hardware, pricing not published
Pricing tiersOn Demand (us-central1) $12 · DWS Flex-start (us-central1) $6 · DWS Calendar Mode (us-central1) $8.4 · 1-year Commitment (us-central1) $8.4 · 3-year Commitment (us-central1) $5.4 · On Demand (europe-west2) $13.2 · DWS Flex-start (europe-west2) $6 · DWS Calendar Mode (europe-west2) $8.4Open Source free
Model stackGemini · Google TPU Ironwood · Ironwood · Ironwood (TPU v7) · Ironwood TPU · Ironwood TPU (7th Generation) · TPU v7 · TPU7x · TPU7x (Ironwood) · XLA compilerCDNA · CDNA 4 · ROCm
Context window——
Public API
Routes models
Changes / 30d113
OriginGlobalGlobal
Capabilities9,216-chip pods, inference optimised, liquid cooled, JAX + PyTorch/XLA, Large-scale training, Reasoning and inference, 9,216 liquid-cooled chips per pod, 42.5 ExaFlops performance288GB HBM3E, FP4/FP6 support, ROCm 7, open rack designs, DPX compute partition mode, CPX compute partition mode, NPS2 memory partitioning, GPU virtualization support
Compare up to four products →