Head to head

Huawei Ascend 910C vs Google TPU Ironwood

Huawei Ascend 910C (Huawei) and Google TPU Ironwood (Google) both sit in Chips & Compute. Google TPU Ironwood shipped more tracked changes in the last 30 days (11 vs 3). Every value below comes from the latest crawl of the vendors' own pages.

AttributeHuawei Ascend 910C

Huawei

Google TPU Ironwood

Google

SegmentChips & ComputeChips & Compute
VersionAscend 910C7th-generation (Ironwood)
Entry costPricing is not publicly available; enterprise/quote-based pricing.from $5.4/unit
Pricing tiers—On Demand (us-central1) $12 · DWS Flex-start (us-central1) $6 · DWS Calendar Mode (us-central1) $8.4 · 1-year Commitment (us-central1) $8.4 · 3-year Commitment (us-central1) $5.4 · On Demand (europe-west2) $13.2 · DWS Flex-start (europe-west2) $6 · DWS Calendar Mode (europe-west2) $8.4
Model stackAscend 910C · CANN / MindSporeGemini · Google TPU Ironwood · Ironwood · Ironwood (TPU v7) · Ironwood TPU · Ironwood TPU (7th Generation) · TPU v7 · TPU7x · TPU7x (Ironwood) · XLA compiler
Context window——
Public API
Routes models
Changes / 30d311
OriginChinaGlobal
Capabilitiesdual-die 910C, CloudMatrix 384 racks, CANN toolkit, MindSpore, CANN 异构计算架构, MindSpore AI框架, MindStudio 全流程工具链, NPU9,216-chip pods, inference optimised, liquid cooled, JAX + PyTorch/XLA, Large-scale training, Reasoning and inference, 9,216 liquid-cooled chips per pod, 42.5 ExaFlops performance
Compare up to four products →