Head to head

Lightmatter vs Google TPU Ironwood

Lightmatter (Lightmatter) and Google TPU Ironwood (Google) both sit in Chips & Compute. Lightmatter is the cheaper entry point at System sales. Google TPU Ironwood shipped more tracked changes in the last 30 days (11 vs 0). Every value below comes from the latest crawl of the vendors' own pages.

AttributeLightmatter

Lightmatter

Google TPU Ironwood

Google

SegmentChips & ComputeChips & Compute
VersionPassage M10007th-generation (Ironwood)
Entry costSystem salesfrom $5.4/unit
Pricing tiers—On Demand (us-central1) $12 · DWS Flex-start (us-central1) $6 · DWS Calendar Mode (us-central1) $8.4 · 1-year Commitment (us-central1) $8.4 · 3-year Commitment (us-central1) $5.4 · On Demand (europe-west2) $13.2 · DWS Flex-start (europe-west2) $6 · DWS Calendar Mode (europe-west2) $8.4
Model stackn/aGemini · Google TPU Ironwood · Ironwood · Ironwood (TPU v7) · Ironwood TPU · Ironwood TPU (7th Generation) · TPU v7 · TPU7x · TPU7x (Ironwood) · XLA compiler
Context window——
Public API
Routes models
Changes / 30d011
OriginGlobalGlobal
CapabilitiesPhotonic interposer, 114 Tbps, 3D packaging9,216-chip pods, inference optimised, liquid cooled, JAX + PyTorch/XLA, Large-scale training, Reasoning and inference, 9,216 liquid-cooled chips per pod, 42.5 ExaFlops performance
Compare up to four products →