Head to head

Tenstorrent Blackhole vs Google TPU Ironwood

Tenstorrent Blackhole (Tenstorrent) and Google TPU Ironwood (Google) both sit in Chips & Compute. Google TPU Ironwood is the cheaper entry point at from $5.4/unit. Tenstorrent Blackhole shipped more tracked changes in the last 30 days (16 vs 15). Every value below comes from the latest crawl of the vendors' own pages.

AttributeTenstorrent Blackhole

Tenstorrent

Google TPU Ironwood

Google

SegmentChips & ComputeChips & Compute
Versionv0.79.0-dev202609137th-generation (Ironwood)
Entry costfrom $999/unitfrom $5.4/unit
Pricing tiersCards $999 · Workstations (TT-QuietBox) $9999 · Servers (Galaxy) $70000On Demand (us-central1) $12 · On Demand (europe-west2) $13.2 · DWS Flex-start (per hour) $6 · DWS Calendar Mode (per hour) $8.4 · 1-year Commitment (us-central1) $8.4 · 3-year Commitment (us-central1) $5.4
Model stackGemma-2 · Gemma4 · GLM-5.2 · Kimi-K3 · Llama-3.3-70B · Qwen3-32B · Tensix cores · tt-metal / tt-nnGemini · Ironwood · Ironwood (TPU v7) · Ironwood TPU · Ironwood TPU (7th Generation) · TPU v7 · TPU7x · TPU7x (Ironwood) · XLA compiler
Context window
Public API
Routes models
Changes / 30d1615
OriginGlobalGlobal
CapabilitiesRISC-V cores, open tt-metal stack, Ethernet-scaled cards, IP licensing, Passive, active and liquid cooling options, High-performance AI processing, Liquid-cooled workstations (TT-QuietBox), Scale-out servers (Tenstorrent Galaxy)9,216-chip pods, inference optimised, liquid cooled, JAX + PyTorch/XLA, Large-scale training, Reasoning and inference, 9,216 liquid-cooled chips per pod, 42.5 ExaFlops performance
Compare up to four products →